
maverick
-
DasLandRoverMan
- The 1-Ton Welder
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:33 am
- Location: West Lakes
- Contact:
Re: maverick
The One Ton Amphibious Land Rover?
Re: maverick
Never heard of it being called anything but an OTAL. Weird bit of kit, basically an amphibious 1-Ton before there was such a thing, on a 97" wheelbase if I remember correctly. I don't know if it was a cut-down 109" or what. The "Milk float" amphib was also on a 97" wheelbase...
http://sebvehicles.blogspot.co.uk/
http://eblrs.org/
1966 IIA Swb 24125067C ex-SEB managers vehicle HMO968D
1969 IIA 1-Ton 22900013A ex-SEB NBK148G
1972 III 1-Ton 26600078A ex-SEB Cherrypicker VJT440L
1973 III 1-Ton 26600082B ex-SEB MRX287L
http://eblrs.org/
1966 IIA Swb 24125067C ex-SEB managers vehicle HMO968D
1969 IIA 1-Ton 22900013A ex-SEB NBK148G
1972 III 1-Ton 26600078A ex-SEB Cherrypicker VJT440L
1973 III 1-Ton 26600082B ex-SEB MRX287L
Re: maverick
-
DasLandRoverMan
- The 1-Ton Welder
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:33 am
- Location: West Lakes
- Contact:
Re: maverick
It might have made the Batman villain of the same name a little more interesting if he drove one?
Re: maverick
-
DasLandRoverMan
- The 1-Ton Welder
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:33 am
- Location: West Lakes
- Contact:
Re: maverick
Whilst the movie itself was questionable, I rather liked the City Cabs.


Re: maverick
The silver one looked a bit better but still lost its appeal to me .I wonder if the green oval sales benefited from it though.
-
DasLandRoverMan
- The 1-Ton Welder
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:33 am
- Location: West Lakes
- Contact:
Re: maverick
There's a good possibility, I loved the thing the first time I saw the article I LRO 17 years back.
I'd love to get hold of a shell and build it up with a space frame to support it properly and allow more interior space (the 101 cab under the shell didn't really lend itself to decent ergonomics.
Wether one would keep the 101 chassis or go for a complete redesign of the chassis/frame is open to debate, but I'd be thinking if putting the engine in the back.
Would be ace for the Tesco run!!!
I'd love to get hold of a shell and build it up with a space frame to support it properly and allow more interior space (the 101 cab under the shell didn't really lend itself to decent ergonomics.
Wether one would keep the 101 chassis or go for a complete redesign of the chassis/frame is open to debate, but I'd be thinking if putting the engine in the back.
Would be ace for the Tesco run!!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest